Failing fitness tests by seconds is not a simple numbers game

It’s a complex and multi-layered problem. Should it be so strictly applied and is it the only or best measure of these things?

Firdose Moonda31-Jan-2023What difference can 18 seconds make?It’s the time you may have taken to read that question eight, maybe nine times; or to decide you don’t want to read and click onto another page (but please don’t!); the time a train going at 25kph takes to pass through a 162 metre station and, if you believe the 1984 edition of the , the time it takes for a doctor to interrupt a patient who is describing their own symptoms. In South African cricket, it’s the difference between having the country’s captain, and one of the icon players of their golden generation, Dané van Niekerk in the T20 World Cup squad, or out of it.Van Niekerk will not feature at the home World Cup because she over-ran her two-kilometre time trial by 18 seconds, which was a personal best for her but not good enough for the standard South African cricket has set. They require their female players to complete the distance in 9 minutes and 30 seconds (a minute more than the male players’ requirement), and 30 seconds faster than the previous standard of 10:00, which was only a guide and not a strict criterion which could cost players their places in squads.Related

  • CSA to be less rigid in applying fitness standards

  • Dane van Niekerk: the fateful end of a storied career

  • Dane van Niekerk set to retire from international cricket

  • Van Niekerk wants to 'find the Dane that I missed' in all the emotional twists and turns

  • Van Niekerk left out of T20 World Cup squad on fitness grounds

In winter 2022, Cricket South Africa (CSA) believed it needed fitter players to keep up with the growing demands of the game, specifically T20 cricket, and it has since been obligatory for any player who aims to be eligible for national selection to meet what is called the fitness benchmark, which covers running, strength and body composition.Van Niekerk has not played for South Africa in that time. She was first out with a lower-back injury and then a broken ankle, which kept her out of last year’s 50-over World Cup. Since then, she has trained with the national team on several occasions and taken the fitness test, with improving results on almost every occasion. She has lost 10 kilograms since the Hundred last August and reached her weight and skin folds benchmark. She passed her strength test, and was then given until last Friday to meet the running requirement. She fell 18 seconds short.”Absolutely broken,” is how she described her state of mind on social media, when the squad was announced. That, ESPNcricinfo understands, has led to serious considerations about the international future for both her and her wife Marizanne Kapp. Kapp has already withdrawn from South Africa’s last competitive game before the T20 World Cup, the tri-series final against India on Thursday, and there are concerns that she may not be at her best, mentally, as the World Cup approaches.That is the last thing the national women’s team need as they head into a tournament where their own management has set them a goal of reaching the final, without four senior players. Of those, at least three are absent because of the administration and two of those three because of the way the fitness standards are applied.Marizanne Kapp opted out of the tri-series final against India soon after her wife Dane Van Niekerk’s omission from the World Cup squad•ICC via GettyLizelle Lee walked away from international cricket last year after she was dropped from the team on their tour of the United Kingdom for failing to meet her weight requirement. Lee feared that CSA would not give her a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) to play in the Hundred and retired instead, which gave her free agency to play in leagues. She has since relocated to Australia. Van Niekerk could go exactly the same way, if she suspects she won’t be given an NOC for the Women’s Premier League (WPL) for example, and CSA is thought to be concerned that both her and Kapp might.Lee also claimed that CSA did not do anything to assist her weight loss and there are rumblings of van Niekerk facing similar issues. While she has been in a few national team camps and she was most recently with the T20I squad in East London, where they are playing the tri-series against India and West Indies, it was on Kapp’s bill. Insiders say van Niekerk was not involved in any of the squad’s training sessions and was left to work on her own, and only saw management when she was called for the fitness test.But Lee’s case is precisely the reason why CSA could not bend the rules for van Niekerk, even though she is the fittest she has ever been. That would have led to accusations of favouritism and inconsistent standards. Their new, rigid way of employing the fitness criteria leaves no wriggle room which, as Herschelle Gibbs put it, if “you miss it by 2 or 10 sec it’s a fail irrespective of who you are.”Should it be this way? Dale Steyn’s counter on Twitter – that missing the two kilometre mark by “seconds, must mean I’m s***” – was delivered sarcastically but not without weight. Of course he isn’t. And neither is van Niekerk.She is South Africa’s second-highest T20I run-scorer, behind only Lee, and since her T20I debut in June 2009, only Shabnim Ismail and Kapp have taken more T20I wickets than her. As an allrounder in the current set-up, she is unmatched and is the only South African woman to have scored more than 1500 runs and taken more than 50 wickets in women’s T20Is.She is also a galvanising leader, under whom South Africa have achieved some of their best results (such as reaching the 2017 World Cup semi-final) and has taken teams at the Hundred and the WBBL to titles. She is tactically astute, reads the game well and has that big-match temperament. In other words, she’s a player you want for an occasion like a World Cup, especially one at home, where she is one of the most recognisable faces of the women’s game, and even more so because depth is a concern in the South African squad.Dane van Niekerk won the Hundred for Oval Invincibles with her South Africa team-mates Marizanne Kapp and Shabnim Ismail•Getty ImagesThe other players not part of this tournament are Mignon du Preez, who retired in December last year to start a family, and Trisha Chetty, who has a long-standing back problem. Du Preez would have been interested in a T20-only contract but CSA’s contracts for women cover both white-ball formats so she had no option but to leave entirely. She still intends on playing some T20 cricket and has put her name in the WPL auction. But her situation is another example of where CSA could show some flexibility, especially as more players opt for one-format contracts to find room to play in more lucrative T20 leagues.Ultimately, that is the reason they have set the minimum standard: to have some form of oversight into how their players are performing against what they believe are improving global standards from which they have fallen behind. At some point, all of India, England and Australia used 8:30 as a two-kilometre time trial as a benchmark for their male players, and there’s a reason for it. Elite athletes are expected to have a certain level of aerobic ability in order to ensure they have endurance and can recover quickly from maximum exertions. Meeting that criteria also shows a level of discipline. But should it be so strictly applied that a player – the captain and arguably best player no less – passes all other tests and misses just one and is out? And is that kind of testing the only or best measure of fitness?Ask van Niekerk and she will likely say no, because she had played her entire career before this running more than the 9:48 she managed last week, and the rules were not strict enough to leave her out then. She is now fitter than she has ever been but CSA demands that she becomes even fitter than she is now. Ask them, and they’ll point to how other players have done it. Ask other sportspeople and fitness experts and you’ll find a range of opinions over the most effective fitness tests and how they should be applied. This is not a simple numbers game but a complex and multi-layered problem with no easy answer, except that for now, 18 seconds have separated van Niekerk from her World Cup dream.

How do you rank the best captain in an individual Test?

The Captaincy Performance Index takes into account the team’s performances and the captain’s individual contribution to the team

Anantha Narayanan11-Mar-2023A couple of weeks ago, an article of mine, on Test captains, was published in the . While that feature covered this fascinating subject in an anecdotal manner, this article will look at the subject from an analytical point of view, using the measure I created to evaluate the performance of Test captains at individual Test level, called Captain Performance Index (CPI).A Test captain’s role in cricket, unlike those of captains in, say, football, Davis Cup tennis, and basketball and baseball, comes with real responsibility. A cricket captain – setting aside the matter of how much advice he receives from the coach – bears responsibility in a number of areas. He selects the team, more or less; determines the sequence of bowlers used; decides the batting order; sets fields; decides whether the team plays safe or aggressively; and a lot more.Inarguably, the Test captain has the most responsible and difficult task among captains in all sports.So how does one measure a captain’s performance? Results, of course, are important here, starting with the captain’s own batting, bowling and fielding performances. Factors such as the venue of the match, the relative strengths of the two teams, how much experience the captain’s team has, and who won the toss, come into play as well.We can look at the numbers relating to these factors in different ways to arrive at an assessment of how the captain performed. But there is one more factor to understand. If a team wins by a margin of, say, under ten runs, we could say that the captain marshalled his troops at key moments. How do we measure a captain’s impact in one- or two-wickets wins? It is the batters at the crease who have to perform. The captain, in the pavilion, can do nothing but chew on his fingernails. But he has to get some credit for such close wins for decisions taken earlier.There are three major bones of contention.The first is that most of these close wins could be attributed to the team rather than the captain, barring personal performances. That’s true, but in my view the captain is like the CEO of a company. He takes important decisions on behalf of the team, he is one with his team, so it does not matter that some of these measures are identified strongly with the team. If the captain wins, the team wins and if the team loses, the captain loses. I am going to treat the captain and the team as roughly synonymous. (And my methodology ensures that “non-playing” captains do not have a great chance of getting high CPI values.)The second is that it is impossible to assign values to captaincy decisions that might have had a profound impact on the course of the match. Say, the captain places two short covers and gets a batter caught driving, or places two leg slips to a sharply turning offspinner and gets his man, or deliberately leaves the midwicket area open and gets the batter top-edging – we have to accept that these are part of the captain’s contribution but cannot really be measured.Finally, how do we really measure the overall game-changing strategic contributions, such as those England captain Ben Stokes has made recently? (The coach, Brendon McCullum, is like the policy-making chairman of the company – let us keep him out of our analysis.) It is impossible to recognise these strategies in an objective manner and we have to be satisfied that these methods have been rewarded by a sequence of ten wins and two losses in 12 matches.What is Captain Performance Index?CPI is calculated through a combination of what the captain achieved for the team, in terms of the result and the margin of result, and how he performed on the field in his individual capacity. These numbers are indexed by four factors: how the teams match up on their strength matrix, their experience quotient, the location of the match, and the result of the toss. The calculations are simple and are explained below. A CPI value of 90.0 is about the highest that can be achieved.

1. Result points

1a. Result: A win is allotted the maximum of 40 points, a tie gets 25 points, and a draw receives 20. A loss is allotted four points because after all, the losing captain too has played, and often fought hard. And he could well have lost a close match, and so deserves these nominal points.Recently, some readers have questioned some of these numbers. Why 40? Why not 50? Why toss?Most of these are relative numbers. These are fixed so that the CPI maxes out at, say, a nice round number like 100. And regarding the weights, these are the result of my analysis for over two decades and the inputs provided through thousands of reader responses. I am open to considering well-thought-out alternatives; say, a fifth multiplying factor, if you have one. Or another base-point factor.1b. Margin: The margin of victory, as perceived in the Team Performance Points measure, is allotted a maximum of ten points. The biggest win is England’s 675-run win over Australia in Brisbane in 1928-29, which is allotted 9.42 points. The teams that did not win receive their fair allocation. Thus, a captain who loses by a narrow margin receives significant recognition.

2. Performance points

These are for a captain’s own performance on the field, based on the percentage of team contribution he made. Care is taken that the performances are substantial and a lightweight one, such as taking two out of three wickets to fall in an innings (where the target is reached or there is a declaration or the match ends), is not rewarded out of proportion. The captain’s individual performances carry around 15-25% weight.2a. Batting: Ten points.2b. Bowling/fielding: Ten points. (Fielding points account for wicketkeeper-captains).

3. Index values

Index values are used to multiply the Base Points. The range of the parameter is an indicator of the weight it has and its importance.3a. Relative Team Strengths: 0.667 (very strong team) to 1.333 (very weak team). Maximum 2.97, and minimum 0.33. These are extrapolated to between 1.33 and 0.667.3b. Location of Test: 0.875 (Home), 1.00 (Neutral), 1.125 (Away).3c. Team Experience: 0.925 to 1.075. This is based on the sum of Tests played by the members of the teams – 600 to 0. Actual value of maximum Tests is 850 (India-2008); the 171 historical values (6%) above 600 are normalised to 600. I have deliberately used the absolute values of the teams rather than the relative values (like the team strength) since I strongly feel that a shortage of experience hits a team badly irrespective of who they play against. The captain of an inexperienced team has to be given credit for his team’s lack of caps.3d. Result of Toss: Winning – 0.975, Losing – 1.025.The product of all four multiplicative indices (MF1) is used to adjust the Result-related values. The product of the first two multiplicative indices (Location and Team Strength – MF2) is used to adjust the Performance values since the Performance does not depend on Team Experience or Toss.Captain Performance Index:
CPI = Result points * MF1 + Performance points * MF2.Anantha NarayananOverall, it can be seen that this is a rather simple, easy-to-understand measure.Let us now move to the tables.

The best performance by a captain was, by a mile, Rashid Khan’s coup d’etat against a much stronger Bangladesh, away from home, with an experience quotient of a mere 13 Tests from the 11 Afghanistan players. Okay, I concede that Rashid won the toss and he performed like a champion himself: 51 (off 61 balls), 5 for 55, 24 (22 balls), and 6 for 49. Truly a great all-round performance. The net effect – a huge CPI value of 91-plus, ahead of the next best by more than ten points. Then comes Imran Khan, who won by an innings against England at Headingley in 1987 after losing the toss and fielding quite a weak team. He took 3 for 37 and 7 for 40 and scored 26.South Africa, led by Trevor Goddard, stunned the strong Australians in Adelaide in 1963-64 by a comfortable margin, which fetched Goddard over 80 points. Archie MacLaren, leading a team containing four debutants and a low experience index, beat a much-fancied Australia side in Sydney in 1901-02. He got close to 80 points. Sunil Gavaskar led the way with a hundred in a tough away win in Auckland in 1975-76 and secured over 78 points. Most of us are familiar with the ninth-placed Test – Mominul Haque secured one of the greatest away wins against a much stronger New Zealand side last year in Mount Maunganui. He scored 101 runs and took two wickets.Indian readers will be happy to see that Ajinkya Rahane’s MCG win in 2020-21 is featured in 14th place. His outstanding match-winning 112 helped the team immensely. And the Brisbane win to seal the series also finds a place in the top 30. Rahane is the only captain to have two entries in the top 30.

I have five classifications in this table on Special CPIs. Since each has four entries, I will only briefly cover one in each classification. The lowest CPI for a win is that of Marvan Atapattu, when a very strong Sri Lanka, with a very experienced team (575 caps), won the toss and won comfortably against Bangladesh in Colombo in 2005. The key factor here is that Atapattu contributed a sum total of 11 runs out of 457, which goes some way to explaining why he secured a low 27 CPI points.The most points for a drawn Test was when John Reid, captaining a considerably weaker and inexperienced New Zealand, secured a draw at The Oval in 1958. Reid scored 27 and 51 not out and took two wickets. He secured a very high 48 points.A draw at Lord’s in 1954 against a considerably weaker and inexperienced Pakistan fetched England captain Len Hutton fewer than 13 CPI points.On the other hand, a decidedly inexperienced Zimbabwe ran Sri Lanka close and lost narrowly in Colombo in 2017. Graeme Cremer got over 30 CPI points for this loss, in which he took nine wickets and 61 runs – more points than Atapattu got for his win, which shows how sturdy the whole CPI concept is.Finally, Mike Gatting, who did nothing in the match, gets a low 3.7 points for a innings loss against a much weaker Pakistan at Headingley in 1987 (the match for which winning captain Imran got 80.73 points).

Who was the best captain, based on average CPI per Test? It is no surprise that Don Bradman leads the table. He achieved a win per cent of 62.5 and an average CPI of over 36.4 CPI points per match. Richie Benaud follows with 33.8 and Ian Chappell is next with 33.5. In sixth place comes a surprise. Abdul Hafeez Kardar, though he won only six out the 23 Tests in which he captained Pakistan, has a relatively high average CPI of 31.9. There are a few reasons for this. The first is that the teams Kardar captained were mostly very weak and with almost no experience. And some of those six wins were memorable, like the one at The Oval in 1954.This would also explain why successful captains like Steve Waugh, Ricky Ponting and Clive Lloyd do not have high average CPI values. They captained strong and experienced teams and the results they produced were mostly expected. While a win is a win, it can be seen that the CPI values can be dramatically different from one win to another. The list of the top captains contains some unexpected names like Dimuth Karunaratne, Shaun Pollock, and John Goddard.

At the other end of the spectrum – low average-CPI values – three Zimbabwe captains prop up the table. Then comes the real surprise. As I said in the article, David Gower had a very poor overall career as a captain. His average CPI value is just over 20. Another relative surprise is India’s Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi. The win-percentage values tell a story. In general, the weaker teams have low values.

The table above is an extension of the average CPI values. I have presented the table by team so that the top captains by teams, based on CPI, can be viewed. The Australian top five have already been presented.Hutton was the best English captain. His average CPI was just above 31 but he had a sub-50 win percentage. Mike Brearley is second. His win percentage was higher, at 58. However, as everyone will be aware, his batting contributions were minimal. He scored only 1100 runs in those 31 matches – a meagre contribution indeed.For India, Virat Kohli is the best captain, by a wide margin. A win percentage of nearly 59 is very good indeed. His CPI average is an acceptable 30.6. Then come Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, and MS Dhoni – but with considerably lower average values. Dravid’s win percentage is quite low.

For West Indies, Lloyd and Viv Richards follow Goddard. It must be understood that Goddard had much weaker teams than the two more illustrious captains. Pollock leads the table for South Africa, followed by Hansie Cronje and Graeme Smith, who averaged 27.2 across no fewer than 109 Tests. Akram was the best Pakistan captain, followed by Kardar, Misbah-ul-Haq and Imran. All have averages exceeding 30. Despite Kane Williamson’s high win percentage, the fact that he had a strong and experienced team meant that Geoff Howarth leads the table for New Zealand. Karunaratne leads for Sri Lanka, way ahead of Angelo Mathews and Mahela Jayawardene.

Now for a set of matches in which the CPI values for the two captains vary by a mile. The highest difference occurred in a match we have already discussed. When Rashid secured over 90 points for Afghanistan’s win against Bangladesh, the local captain, Shakib Al Hasan, secured a mere 8.6 points, a huge 83-point difference. Everything that worked for Rashid worked against Shakib. At Headingley in 1987, Gatting secured 3.8 points, while Imran got 80.73 points.

In most Tests, one captain gets the benefit of potentially getting more points because it is an away game for his team, and one gets the toss benefit. Unless the teams are evenly matched on the team-strength factor, one team will benefit. It’s the same with the experience factor. And the captains perform at varying levels. In other words, the base factors could vary considerably, as also the multiplication factors. Given all these variations, it is a miracle if the two CPI values almost match. The way the values in the table above cancel each other out is fascinating. The match scorelines are very interesting.At Newlands in 1992-93, Kepler Wessels and Mohammad Azharuddin managed to secure the same number of CPI points in a well-contested match. India, set 215 to win, were 29 for 1. In Chennai in 1981-82, India had the edge over England, but the other factors helped England attain parity. At The Oval in 1909 a tight match ended almost perfectly balanced, with England at 104 for 3, chasing 313 against Australia. In Lahore against West Indies in 1980-81, Pakistan led by 72 runs but slipped in the second innings and had a lead of 228 with three wickets in hand. The captains did not do much. In Napier in 2009-10, New Zealand had the edge at the end of the match against a well-matched Pakistan. Both captains did well.

Finally, a table to identify the best ten-Test sequences any captain has had.Johnny Douglas had a ten-Test sequence in 1911-12 in which he accumulated over 450 CPI points. It was a win-dominant sequence with several away victories. Imran had a good unbeaten sequence in 1987; though he had only three wins, most of the draws were in away Tests. But what really helped him was his performances in these matches – 400 runs and 45 wickets. Dean Elgar captained South Africa to an excellent 440-plus point sequence in which he had wins over West Indies, India, New Zealand and Bangladesh. Bradman had a similar sequence between 1937 and 1946. However, it must be remembered that England were also quite comparable in those times.Readers might wonder what has happened to all those successful sequences of West Indies in the 1980s and Australia in the 2000s. The truth is that these were almost certainly the strongest teams of their era and they just bulldozed their opponents, home or away, The captains had hugely experienced teams under their command. Many of their wins were clocked at CPI values of around 30. The bottom line is that just about any top player could have captained these teams and reached levels close to what those captains achieved. For the record, Waugh’s best sequence was 349 points, Lloyd’s 356, and Ponting’s, 342.There’s another way of looking at the Australian streaks. I have looked at each of the 32 Tests and perused the key numbers at the beginning of the Test. The numbers clearly indicate that in every Test plus the two Tests that ended the streaks, Australia were favourites to win.

Conclusion

It can be seen that the CPI, although it has strong team-centric features, gives a good idea of how a captain has performed – both in leadership and player roles. Rightly, the result carries a higher weight. However, the captain’s performances on the field have sufficient weight to clearly identify performing and non-performing captains.Talking Cricket Group
Any reader who wishes to join the general-purpose cricket-ideas-exchange group of this name that I started last year can email me a request for inclusion, providing their name, place of residence, and what they do.

How many players have batted on every day of a Test?

And how many women have been out for 99 in one?

Steven Lynch27-Jun-2023In the first Ashes Test there were 11 players who had taken at least one five-for in their career – six from England and five from Australia. Is this the most for any Test match? asked Jatin Patra via Facebook

Rather surprisingly, perhaps, there have been several instances of 11 players going into a Test having taken five wickets in an innings at least once: the exciting first Ashes Test at Edgbaston was the 21st such occasion. The record is actually 12 players, which has happened twice: by Australia and England in Adelaide in 1974-75, and England and West Indies at Old Trafford in 2020.Usman Khawaja batted on each day of the first Test. How rare is this? asked Tim McClelland from England

Usman Khawaja’s award-winning effort in the first Ashes Test at Edgbaston was the 13th occasion that a man had batted on each day of a five-day Test. He was the third to do it this year: both West Indian openers, Kraigg Brathwaite and Tagenarine Chanderpaul, batted on all five days against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo in February.The first to achieve the feat was the talented Indian ML Jaisimha, against Australia in Calcutta in 1959-60. It should be borne in mind that many Tests, especially before the Second World War, were scheduled for fewer than five days.How many women have been out for 99 in a Test, as Ellyse Perry was last week? asked Lesley Robertson from Australia

Ellyse Perry, who fell for 99 in the Ashes Test at Trent Bridge last week, was only the fourth woman to be dismissed one short of a century in a Test match. The previous instance was by her current team-mate, Jess Jonassen, against England in Canterbury in 2015. That was Jonassen’s debut; she hasn’t yet reached three figures in a Test.The first to fall for 99 in a women’s Test was England’s Betty Snowball, against Australia at The Oval in 1937, and it also happened to Australia’s captain Jill Kennare against India in Bombay in 1983-84.There have been five 99s (and a 99 not out) in women’s ODIs, but none yet in T20Is.Betty Snowball (left) was the first woman to be dismissed for 99 in a Test•Getty ImagesBangladesh beat Afghanistan by 546 runs recently – was this a Test record? asked Mehdi Hossain from Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s thrashing of Afghanistan in Mirpur last week was actually the third-heaviest defeat by runs in any Test. Biggest of all was England’s 675-run win against Australia in Brisbane in 1928-29 (Don Bradman’s Test debut, as it happens). Australia returned the favour by crushing England by 562 runs at The Oval in 1934 (Bradman scored 244, and Bill Ponsford 266 in his final Test).The heaviest Test defeat of any kind came at The Oval in 1938, when England beat Australia by an innings and 579 runs – Bradman was injured and unable to bat (England’s captain declared at 903 for 7, but it’s said he might have carried on had the Don been fit). Australia beat South Africa by an innings and 360 runs in Johannesburg in 2001-02. Here’s the list of the biggest innings victories .At the end of the second day of Bangladesh’s Test against Afghanistan, both batters had the same score (54, from 64 balls). How often has this happened? asked Badri Meden from India

There are many instances of the two not-out batters having the same score at the of a day’s play in a Test, including lots of 0s, but only 12 times had they both scored 50 or more. The highest identical overnight score is 85 not out, by the Indian pair of Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir at the end of the third day against South Africa in Kanpur in 2004-05. Gary Kirsten and Jacques Kallis both had 80 not out at the end of the second day of South Africa’s Test against England in Cape Town in 1999-2000.Madhav Apte and Vijay Hazare of India were both undefeated with 63 at the end of the second day against West Indies in Bridgetown in 1952-53, and Brian Chari and Craig Ervine of Zimbabwe both had 60 at the second-day close against Sri Lanka in Harare in 2016-17. There was another case of this earlier this year, in February in the Bulawayo match mentioned in the second question above, when the West Indies openers Kraigg Brathwaite and Tagenarine Chanderpaul both had 55 at the end of the first day against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo.None of the other 50-plus instances involve the same number of balls, as in Mirpur recently, where both Zakir Hasan and Najmul Hossain had faced 64. In the Bulawayo match earlier this year, for example, Chanderpaul had faced 170 balls and Brathwaite 138.By chance I received a similar question from another correspondent, who was adamant the answer was the 63 of Apte and Hazare. The table he produced in support, which he apparently found somewhere online, was missing three of the top four instances (and five of the 12 overall), and so wasn’t very reliable at all! Beware of Ask Steven imitators…Shiva Jayaraman of ESPNcricinfo’s stats team helped with some of the above answers.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Scriptless Sri Lanka put hopes on hold

The team is youthful and there is promise, but there are significant gaps in skill and strategy, and no serious body of work to look back at

Andrew Fidel Fernando05-Oct-20231:58

Spin-heavy Sri Lanka could sneak into knockouts

If there had been hype building for this Sri Lanka side through their Asia Cup campaign, much of it burned down, like a Vesak lantern that catches fire and ends in a smouldering mess, as a result of that calamitous final – a total of 50 all out tends to have this effect.But there been a hard-fought victory against Pakistan to reach that final, plus two wins over Bangladesh through the course of the campaign, as well as a victory over Afghanistan that was partly the result of the opposition’s miscalculations. There is enough of a body of work to suggest this is no pushover team, even if they had to qualify for this World Cup via a qualifier in Zimbabwe (in a tournament they went unbeaten in, by the way).Expectations at home, though, are muted. Dare fans dream of a semi-final spot? Right now, it seems more sensible to find reasons to keep a lid on the excitement.Related

  • In warm and humid Delhi, it could be South Africa's batters vs Sri Lanka's spinners

  • Coach Simons hoping Rabada and Coetzee get into the heads of opposition

  • Podcast: Will the World Cup save ODIs?

  • Where the 2023 World Cup could be won

  • Sri Lanka out to prove heydays are not behind them

Chief among these reasons, perhaps, is that captain Dasun Shanaka has been on perhaps the longest stretch of batting misery as can be remembered for a Sri Lanka cricketer (and this is something of a crowded field). We won’t run through his recent run of scores here, largely because even stating these facts seems malicious. Suffice to say the guy averages 9.78 and has struck at 76 since March this year and, if anything, the scores are getting leaner.If he were not captain, he would have been dropped. In fact, despite his having led Sri Lanka to better ODI results than in the years prior to his captaincy, Sri Lanka’s selectors still seriously considered letting him go in the days following 50 all out. Part of why they have retained him is because no other player is seriously gunning for the job, of which there may be two interpretations: either no one wants to be saddled with the leadership of this team for a World Cup campaign, or there remains trust in Shanaka within the dressing room.Still, a non-performing captain is unlikely to venture the kind of risks that might see a side with such limited resources overperform in the tournament, which, let’s be honest, is what they would be doing if they were in that final four. He is a diminished force in selection conversations. And if, early in the tournament especially, someone needs to be told they are left out of the XI… how does Shanaka even broach that conversation?Beyond this big one, several other concerns.Kusal Perera will likely start the tournament as the opener that partners Pathum Nissanka, but there remain serious doubts as to whether his ailing body can withstand a 50-over tournament that puts teams on a travel-train-play treadmill for almost six weeks. Even when Shanaka contributes, Sri Lanka have been poor at providing the finishing fireworks that good ODI sides frequently produce with the bat. And though several of Sri Lanka’s batting performances in the Asia Cup were founded on Kusal Mendis’ innings, Mendis has not historically been a sustainer of good form.If Dasun Shanaka were not captain, he would have been dropped•AFP/Getty ImagesEven the bowling attack, which has bowled out 13 of its last 15 oppositions, has hit new snags. Wanindu Hasaranga is not in the squad, after aggravating a hamstring injury. Hasaranga had not completely cracked ODI cricket, so perhaps this is not as substantial a bowling loss as it may appear. But his batting brought crucial balance, particularly in the context of Shanaka’s form. Maheesh Theekshana remains under an injury cloud too.If Sri Lanka go with Matheesha Pathirana in their starting XI, as they are likely to do, they will have to find a second new-ball bowler to partner Dilshan Madushanka. For all the pace and death-overs skill that Pathirana brings, he remains unable to swing the new ball, for now. In the Asia Cup, it came down to Shanaka – whose average speeds are in the mid 120kph range – to bowl in the powerplay.Pathirana is, to some extent, a fitting mascot for the team. It is youthful (only five of 15 squad members are over 30, and three of those are 32 or younger), and, to some extent, full of promise. But there are also significant gaps in skill and strategy, and no serious body of work to which they can point.Where once Sri Lanka built conscientiously towards global events, they have tended to lurch scriptlessly towards them in the past seven years. If there is hope, it is hope in youth; that someone will find a new gear. That collectively, there are enough unknowns here, that they will surprise.

Bangladesh's spin band delivers another hit, sans leading man

There was no Shakib Al Hasan, but Taijul Islam, Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Nayeem Hasan managed to tie New Zealand down in knots

Mohammad Isam01-Dec-2023The scene is all too familiar. The Bangladesh spinner rips his fingers to snap out the ball. An umbrella of close-in fielders are waiting to pounce. The overseas batter picks the ball from the hand but can’t fully judge how much the ball will turn. Whether to play forward or back, he wonders. Crucially, the overseas batters doubt whether it will keep low or kick up. Except for that last part about the bounce, it was all standard stuff in Sylhet in the last four days.Bangladesh’s spinners have taken 15 wickets in this game so far. They have left their side on the verge of beating New Zealand at home for the first time with this big effort. Taijul Islam has stepped up as the attack leader in Shakib Al Hasan’s absence, although he told the reporter who asked him about it not to make him into a (old man). Mehidy Hasan Miraz is Taijul’s second fiddle, mainly playing as the team’s allrounder in this game. Nayeem Hasan only ever plays home Tests. He has never bowled abroad.Related

  • Southee admits NZ bowlers 'did not apply pressure long enough'

  • Taijul leaves Bangladesh three wickets away from victory on last day

  • Calm and clinical Shanto brings back Bangladesh's smile

  • Southee expects spin to play a big role in 'hard-fought' series

The band obviously is missing the lead man, but even without Shakib, Bangladesh’s spinners were lethal against New Zealand. Shakib’s absence usually leaves a big hole in both the batting order and the bowling attack. Now that it happens so often, especially in Tests, the rest of the team is getting used to it. Bangladesh have done well getting back to the basics, and doing what they do best, this point especially applying for the spinners. Taijul said that he only focuses on bowling in his one spot, and then trying his variations from that point.It was expected of the new captain Najmul Hossain Shanto to keep Taijul bowling continuously from one end. Generally an energetic personality, Shanto, however, kept things moving from both ends. He gave Taijul 20 overs but ensured the left-arm spinner kept bowling attacking lines. He allowed Shoriful to bowl six overs at the top, which Bangladeshi captains like Shakib and Mominul Haque have usually tended not to do in such situations. Shoriful picked up one wicket, keeping things tight as well.Shanto took off Mehidy after his first over, but later gave him two spells. Mehidy took a wicket early in his second spell, removing Henry Nicholls. Taijul bowled 15 on either side of the tea break, but with always a more concentrated off-stump line, as opposed to his defensive outside off-stump line when Shakib is around.Taijul did the job too for his captain, picking up three wickets in his first spell. After a short break, he took a wicket in his second spell. Shanto brought on Nayeem quite late on the day, but gave him an eight-over spell first, and then two more in the end. Shanto used Mominul for just two overs on the fourth day, maybe by popular choice after the part-time left-armer took three wickets in the first innings.Taijul said that Bangladesh have a job to do even without Shakib in the team. The players know their specific roles, but it also changes according to the shape of the game. He said that when they get on top of big teams, it suggests that Bangladesh are changing from within.”I can’t do what someone else is doing, and someone else can’t do what I do,” Taijul said about bowling without Shakib in the attack. “I stick to my plan. Whether we have Shakib or not, we have other spinners in the team. Plans change from game to game – someone takes the wickets, someone defends the runs. If I stopped the runs, Miraz or Nayeem would have taken the wickets. The main thing is, if the team is doing well.”It is a truly different feeling to beat big teams. We haven’t won the game yet but we are trying our hardest to win this game. Confidence goes up so that we can use this for the rest of the year. It suggests a change in the team. I don’t know how many matches we will win but I want to do something good for the Bangladesh team.”Bangladesh’s bowlers were all over New Zealand on the fourth day•AFP/Getty ImagesThere’s so much belief in Taijul that when he came into the attack to bowl at Kane Williamson, one of the Bangladesh fielders commented that Williamson was his wicket. Taijul said that it speaks of the confidence that the team has on him, but also that he is quite strong in his own belief of his line and length.”I guess they have faith in me that I can set (Williamson) up to take his wicket. I have been playing for nine years, you know.”I don’t really prepare in that particular way. I have only one preparation: my spot. I try to bowl in that spot, and try my variations from there,” he said.But what Taijul does, is quite difficult without the likes of Mehidy and Nayeem. Both are orthodox offspinners without any mystery deliveries but they keep batters honest on offstump. It is what they do well for long periods in a match. Of course, they have had their ups and downs, but Taijul and Mehidy have generally stepped up well when Shakib isn’t around.

“The fans will surely want the three remaining New Zealand wickets to fall quickly on the fifth morning. If it all goes to the spinners, it will be just reward for a band of bowlers who have done most of the running in this game”

Mehidy, in particular, had an interesting time in the World Cup recently, when his batting was more in the limelight. He batted in several spots, which is now being discussed as one of the reasons for Bangladesh’s failure in the tournament. It wasn’t Mehidy’s fault by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, he kept getting the runs in any position he was sent out. It probably affected his bowling a bit, but it is quite hard to knock Mehidy off his bowling spot in the last few years.Nayeem, meanwhile, has had to rely heavily on domestic cricket for much of his international career. He has only played a handful of home Tests since his debut five years ago. It is hard to motivate oneself plugging away in the domestic grind, but he seems to enjoy it. He took 36 wickets for Chattogram Division in this season’s NCL.The spin trio had to bring their A-game in this game as this is a difficult time in Bangladesh cricket. There’s lack of belief among their fans, which is reflected in the near-empty stands in all four days of the Test in Sylhet. There’s likely to be a few more coming to the stadium on the fifth morning. They will surely want the three remaining New Zealand wickets to fall quickly. If it all goes to the spinners, it will be just reward for a band of bowlers who have done most of the running in this game.

Smart Stats – Deepti Sharma bags impact honours in WPL 2024

A look at the MVPs and the most impactful performances of WPL 2024, based on ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats

S Rajesh18-Mar-2024Royal Challengers Bangalore swept most of the honours in WPL 2024 – apart from the trophy, they also took the Orange and Purple Cap awards – but the prize for Most Valuable Player (MVP) went to UP Warriorz’ Deepti Sharma. According to ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats, which gives a rating value to every batting and bowling performance based on match context, Deepti got a rating of 82.85 impact points (on a per-match basis), with Marizanne Kapp and Ellyse Perry taking the next two spots.Top impact values in WPL 2024 (Min 5 matches)•ESPNcricinfo LtdThough Warriorz didn’t even make the playoffs, Sharma had an outstanding tournament with both bat and ball. She was the leading run-scorer for her team, and the fifth-highest among all batters in the tournament, despite batting only twice in the top four. (She scored 147 runs in those two innings.) Her 295 runs came at an average of 98.33 – she was dismissed only three times in eight innings – and a strike rate of 136.57. With ball, she was the second-highest wicket-taker for Warriorz with 10, at an economy rate of 7.23.Related

  • Anatomy of champions: How RCB went from 0-5 to WPL winners in a year

  • Mandhana shuns the spotlight as 'Queens 2024' party at the Kotla

  • 'Proud' Mandhana lauds RCB's fighting spirit: 'I just want to say, ee sala cup namdu'

  • Perry and spinners steer RCB to WPL title

Apart from the sheer number of runs and wickets, what earned her more impact points was the match context and pressure under which she performed. Despite batting in the middle or lower-middle order, she scored 107 more runs than the next-highest run-getter for Warriorz. A good example of her lone-ranger act was in Warriorz’ last game of the tournament, against Gujarat Giants: requiring 153 to win, Warriorz fell eight short, but Deepti scored an unbeaten 88 out of the team total of 144; the others in the top six made a combined contribution of 13 runs.

Overall, she scored 27.1% of Warriorz’ total bat runs in the tournament, which is only marginally lower than Perry’s 27.3% of RCB’s bat runs in the nine games she played. However, Deepti’s strike rate of 136.57 was much higher than the team’s overall strike rate of 118.4; in Perry’s case, her strike rate of 125.72 was as much as the team’s strike rate of 126.52. These factors meant that Deepti’s overall batting rating of 43.32 – third among all batters with a five-match cut-off – was marginally higher than Perry’s 41.11.With ball too, she had an outstanding tournament, which is reflected in her bowling rating of 39.53, the fourth-best among those who played at least five matches. Deepti’s economy rate of 6.30 in the middle overs was the best among the 17 bowlers who bowled at least 10 overs during this phase in the tournament, while in the death overs she took six wickets from just eight overs.

She also dominates the list for most impactful performances in a match. Her 2 for 22 and unbeaten 88 against Giants fetched her 199 points, while her other big all-round performance – 59 and 4 for 19 against Delhi Capitals fetched 197.5 points. Those are the two leading performances in a match, and is followed closely by Perry’s stunning 6 for 15 against Mumbai Indians.

ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Want to win a T20 league? Take wickets

The IPL might still be a batter’s game, but elsewhere it’s bowlers who are winning teams T20 league titles

Matt Roller29-Apr-2024It was the break-up that stunned the Big Bash. For 11 seasons, Chris Lynn embodied Brisbane Heat: born and bred in the city, Lynn was the team’s final link back to the squad that won them their only title in 2012-13. Along with Brendon McCullum, he was one half of the Bash Brothers, the six-hitting partnership that formed the basis of Heat’s marketing and on-field strategy.But two years ago a Queensland Cricket committee chaired by the former Australia wicketkeeper Ian Healy decided that with Lynn’s five-year, million-dollar contract at an end, so was his time with Heat. Healy denied that “behavioural or cultural” issues were a factor and said plainly: “This is a sign that Brisbane Heat are going more to winning than entertaining.”It was not that Lynn’s record for Heat – 3005 runs, then the most in BBL history for a single club, at an average of 34.54 and a strike rate of 148.83 – was not exceptional. But in a league with a salary cap, Heat were pouring a significant proportion of their resources into Lynn’s wages; every year they found themselves relying on his runs to dig them out of holes.”People came to the consensus that Brisbane, as a city, loves a winner,” says Charles Evans, Heat’s performance strategist. “The market dynamics are batter-heavy in the T20 industry. Look at the drafts and auctions around the world and it’s blokes that whack it and bowl a little bit going for unbelievable numbers, and only the occasional bowler.”No one really blinks at the batter that’s making a huge splash in your contract list. They just think, ‘Well, they have to: they’re the opener, they’re the No. 3.’ Whereas people aren’t probably thinking the same way with a bowler, who can only bowl a fifth of your overs…Related

  • Defensive Deshpande levels up to fill CSK's Bravo role

  • Varun and Salt star in comprehensive KKR win

  • LSG get Mayank boost while Mumbai look to keep their playoff hopes alive

  • Who is the most impactful bowler in T20s? (2020)

  • How important is bowling in T20? Less than you might think (2018)

“It’s not that our bowling was neglected, but it certainly wasn’t viewed in the light of being so important to win championships.”Heat’s decision to reshape their squad to prioritise their bowling attack brought immediate success. After shifting away from big-name batters and investing heavily in a varied bowling line-up, they reached two consecutive finals. In the second of those, this January, after topping the league phase, they won their second BBL title – and their first without Lynn.Heat fit the global trend: in 2023 and 2023-24, in seven of the top ten global T20 leagues*, the team with the best bowling strike rate went on to win the title; every winning team ranked in at least the top three for bowling strike rate. T20 is often said to have skewed the game in batters’ favour – yet teams that take wickets most regularly tend to emerge as champions.*classified as: IPL (India), Blast, Hundred (both England), CPL (West Indies), LPL (Sri Lanka), BBL (Australia), ILT20 (UAE), SA20 (South Africa), BPL (Bangladesh), PSL (Pakistan)

****

In the mid-2010s a trend emerged from T20’s first data boom: captains started to give the new ball to spinners, daring opening batters to take an early risk and attempting to “burn” an over at the start of an innings. Samuel Badree, the West Indies legspinner, had done it for years but increasingly teams used part-time spinners with the new ball.

The idea, recalls Tom Moody, whose Sunrisers Hyderabad team won the IPL in 2016, and who now coaches Oval Invincibles in the Hundred, was “to give them that extra flexibility as the overs unfold, and to help manage their [bowling] resources”. But the trade-off was inherently defensive: new white balls rarely swing for more than two or three overs, so opening the bowling with spin meant reducing your seamers’ chances of finding early assistance.In T20, teams are relatively unlikely to be bowled out: on a rough average, most completed innings finish with teams six wickets down. That general rule prompted many bowling teams to focus primarily on defence: with batters placing a much lower value on their wicket than in other formats, bowlers were evaluated on their dot-ball percentages and economy rates.Somerset, in England’s T20 Blast, were among the many teams to follow the trend: Max Waller, the legspinner, became their most common opening bowler between 2017 and 2020. It was fundamentally a defensive move, in keeping with most decisions that Somerset made with their bowlers: the tiny boundaries at their home ground in Taunton were seen to necessitate that.”You can be quite fearful in white-ball cricket,” says Jason Kerr, their head coach, who cites the fact that Taunton is “the highest-scoring T20 ground in the world” – beating even the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru. “Often a lot of language is around the defensive, and how you can stop people scoring.Matt Henry was the star of Somerset’s retooled bowling strategy in the 2023 T20 Blast, which they won. Henry took 31 wickets, topping the tournament table, and his team-mate Ben Green was second, with 30•Getty ImagesSince Waller’s retirement, though, Somerset’s bowling strategy has transformed. In 2023, Craig Overton bowled three powerplay overs in each of the 14 matches he played and took 12 wickets in that phase; only his team-mate Matt Henry, signed as an overseas player, took more – 17. Both are traditional right-arm seamers who were empowered to attack with the new ball.”Our mantra is that you’re constantly trying to take wickets,” Kerr says. “We wanted to be really clear on the roles that the bowlers were going to fulfil. We were really clear on who was taking the new ball and what we were asking them to do with it… we had two world-class bowlers at the top of the order and they executed brilliantly.”In a 17-match Blast season, Somerset bowled their opponents out ten times and took 151 wickets out of a possible 170. It was – by some distance – the most wickets that a bowling team has taken in a single T20 tournament; fittingly, they defended a below-par 145 all out in the final by reducing Essex to 44 for 4 in the powerplay and eventually bowling them out for 131, with nine balls unused.Somerset’s success speaks to a broader trend in T20 bowling strategy. Almost every batter in the world scores at a quicker rate as their innings progresses and once they are accustomed to conditions, so bowling defensively comes with its risks. It might be a good short-term ploy, but it is likely to cause major problems at the end of an innings when you are bowling a set batter.Henry’s attacking prowess earned him his first IPL contract in seven years, at the age of 32. “Historically, we have looked at dot balls as being the key measure when it comes to restricting batting sides,” Moody says. “That balance has slowly shifted until the point we are now, where we put more value on the importance of taking wickets and then dot balls come in at second priority.”Tom Moody of Oval Invincibles (and formerly Sunrisers Hyderabad): “History will show that bowling-strong sides have a higher win ratio than batting-strong sides”•ECB via Getty ImagesConsider Sam Curran. At the men’s T20 World Cup in 2022, Curran became England’s designated death bowler and performed so well that he was named player of the tournament: his 10.4 overs at the death brought him nine wickets, and cost only 70 runs. Clearly he played a significant role in England’s eventual success.But Curran was also the beneficiary of his team-mates’ ability to take wickets regularly throughout an innings: more than half of the balls that he bowled at the death were to batters who had come in at No. 7 or below, and none were to top-three batters. In keeping with the worldwide trend, England’s bowling strike rate was the second best at that World Cup, behind only South Africa and New Zealand, who were tied at No. 1.Perhaps this is not a huge surprise. It is hardly revelatory that teams that take lots of wickets are successful. However, as Heat’s Evans says, “If you just picked the five bowlers in world cricket with the lowest strike rates, you wouldn’t win that many tournaments. They will all be seamers and they will all bowl regularly at the death.”Instead, the best teams recruit with specific phases in mind: when Sunrisers Eastern Cape lost Overton to injury after his fine Blast with Somerset put him on their radar, they replaced him with another new-ball specialist, Daniel Worrall, who had thrived in the powerplay in the Hundred. Worrall was an unheralded T20 bowler, but he finished as the third-highest wicket-taker in the SA20 earlier this year.Heat largely opted to pick six specialist bowlers, giving them flexibility and enabling them to pick a varied attack: they had a legspinner and a left-arm spinner in Mitchell Swepson and Matt Kuhnemann; two right-arm seamers, Xavier Bartlett and Michael Neser; and two tall left-armers, Paul Walter and Spencer Johnson, whose average speeds varied by around 15kph.Sam Curran was player of the tournament in the 2022 T20 World Cup, but would he have been as much of a death-overs success story as he was if his team-mates hadn’t prised out opposition top orders?•Cameron Spencer/Getty Images”It means you can cater with whatever gets thrown at you,” Evans explains. “That’s what a good bowling attack does: it gives you options. And a good bowling attack is a balanced one. Nobody can really set up a batting line-up that can actually hit you out of the park or go extended periods without a wicket, because there’s always [a bowler] available to the captain at any given moment.”A T20 bowling innings does not exist in a vacuum. The approach that a batting team takes depends on a number of different variables: are they setting a target or chasing one? Will the pitch enable them to hit through the line? Do they need to go hard because of the opposition’s imposing batting line-up, or can they be more cautious because they are facing a team whose strength is in their bowling?In the men’s Hundred, Manchester Originals have reached two successive finals without lifting the trophy. They have been prolific wicket-takers in both seasons, in part because their bowlers have often been defending huge totals thanks to Jos Buttler and Phil Salt’s prolific opening partnerships. “We’ve had times where we put big scores on the board, and that pressure then works in the bowlers’ favour,” Simon Katich, their coach, says.Last year, Katich’s Originals lost out to Moody’s Oval Invincibles in the final. Invincibles were by far the highest wicket-takers in the tournament. “I’ve always had, front of mind, the management of the 120 balls as a bowling and fielding unit, as opposed to the batting side of it,” Moody says. “History will show that bowling-strong sides have a higher win ratio than batting-strong sides.”And yet, countless franchises around the world continue to invest significantly more in their batting resources than their bowlers, suggesting inefficiencies in the market. When Royal Challengers Bengaluru conceded a record 287 against Sunrisers Hyderabad this season, the six bowlers they used cost a combined Rs 13.25 crore out of their Rs 100 crore salary cap.Arshdeep Singh and Harshal Patel of Punjab Kings, who have a fine bowling attack but are up against the fact that the IPL is now a 12-a-side league and bowlers are at the receiving end•Associated Press”You have to consider supply and demand,” Moody says. “If I’m looking for opening batters on the global market, you could cast the net out and argue the toss over about 20 players, but if I was to do that for match-winning specialist spinners or specialist new-ball bowlers or specialist death bowlers, that net is a very small one by comparison.” This might help explain the high prices Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins and Alzarri Joseph fetched in the last auction.The Impact Player rule has changed the dynamics of the IPL, with scoring rates shooting up by nearly one run per over since its introduction in 2023. “Five [wickets] in 15 [overs] used to give you an open end,” Mike Hesson said last year, when he was RCB’s director of cricket. “Now you’ve got to probably get at least one more… you have to continue to attack, not just defend.”In 2023, Chennai Super Kings’ title win owed as much to their destructive batting line-up as their bowling unit, while the early signs in 2024 are that wicket-taking might not be such a clear driver of success in a 12-a-side league: after their first eight matches, Punjab Kings ranked second on bowling strike rate but had only managed two wins.As soon as one trend becomes apparent, another starts. “It’s funny: you almost have to check yourself,” Evans says. “You get really excited because something seems to work really well, but then you’re like, ‘Woah, let’s just make sure we’re maintaining an even keel.'”Not long after we speak, Heat’s coach Wade Seccombe loses his job due to Queensland’s poor performances in other formats, and their leading run-scorer, Josh Brown, signs for Melbourne Renegades. In the T20 world, change is the only constant.

Xavier Bartlett's 'surreal few months' leaves him eager for more

The fast bowler burst into international cricket earlier this year and will shortly be part of Australia’s T20I squad in the UK

Andrew McGlashan16-Aug-2024A lot happened very quickly for Xavier Bartlett at the start of the year.Having not played the first half of the Australian domestic season due to a back injury, in late January the fast bowler helped seal the BBL title for Brisbane Heat, his two wickets to close out the final leaving him top of the tournament tally.A little over a week later he made his Australia debut in an ODI against West Indies. In the space of five days took consecutive four-wicket hauls in Melbourne and Canberra, earning Player of the Match on both occasions and Player of the Series. A week later he made his T20I debut and was in the wickets again. By the end of March, he had been handed a Cricket Australia contract.Related

  • Cummins: Having allrounders in the top six 'huge'

  • Stoinis and Agar lose CA deals while Bartlett earns full contract

  • Cummins likely to make Sheffield Shield return before India Tests

  • Jhye Richardson back to old ways after beating hamstring woe

  • Bartlett's stunning start in ODIs adds to Australia's pace options

“It was a very surreal few months,” Bartlett told ESPNcricinfo. “To get the CA contract and even just playing the one-day series and then the T20s, it happened very fast and something I wasn’t expecting. Very thankful and it definitely instils you with a lot of confidence that a lot of people see a future in you. Hopefully, I can go out there and repay the faith.”His winter has not played out to be quite as busy as initially planned with a County Championship stint with Kent pulled as CA manages Bartlett carefully. “With my injury history, we had to make a decision there and I was comfortable with that,” he said.But he was still able to play eight T20 Blast matches for the county where he collected nine wickets, and he now hopes to use some of the lessons learnt when he returns to the UK as part of Australia’s T20I squad for the matches against Scotland and England next month.”Probably my length was the main thing I found in England compared to Australia where the wickets are bouncier,” he said. “A bit of a difference with the boundary dimensions and working out the slower wickets, maybe having fielders a bit squarer than you would in Australia.”Pace and swing: Xavier Bartlett struck in his first over on debut against West Indies•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesSignificant parts of Bartlett’s BBL success and the early hauls in international cricket have come from sharp new-ball movement – he dismantled Hobart Hurricanes’ middle order in a memorable display at the Gabba while his first Australia wicket of Justin Greaves at the MCG was a wonderful delivery that started to shape in then moved away late – and he doesn’t look to change much between formats early in an innings.”At the start, I try and swing it in all formats…just have to adjust a little quicker in white-ball cricket if someone is trying to line me up,” he said. “If you slightly miss [the batters] definitely put your bad ball away, and sometimes your good ball goes for four or six which is just T20.”

It’s no easy feat to break into Australia’s fast-bowling ranks. Behind the big three of Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood there’s a list that includes Lance Morris, Michael Neser and Scott Boland, while Jhye Richardson retains a contract and will return to the mix if he can stay injury-fee. Then there is also Nathan Ellis, Spencer Johnson (who has been ruled out of the UK tour) and Sean Abbott in white-ball cricket. Now it includes Bartlett as well.”Could sit here and talk for hours about how many great fast bowlers we have so it’s just [about] trying and break through and if you do get an opportunity, it’s about trying to take it with both hands,” he said. “Now hopefully rubbing shoulders with those sorts of blokes, learning off them, will hold me in good stead in years to come.”You watch our big three – Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins – they’ve been amazing for such a long time and it’s a testament to their skill but also probably how many sacrifices they have made to keep themselves at such a high level for such a long period of time.”

“It [CA contract] definitely instils you with a lot of confidence that a lot of people see a future in you. Hopefully, I can go out there and repay the faith.”Xavier Bartlett

At Queensland and Brisbane Heat he has leant heavily on bowling coach Andy Bichel. “Through injury, I have spent a lot of time with him, watching a lot of games when I haven’t been playing then also all the technical changes that I’ve made with him,” he said. “He’s someone I really trust. He’s one of the great men. Love working with him.”Bartlett hopes for a longer run of Sheffield Shield cricket this season (and a chance to play the County Championship in the future) although there will likely continue to be a close eye kept on his workloads. He played three matches in the second half of last season where he claimed 11 wickets and got through a sizeable workload. Against Western Australia at the WACA, he sent down 41 overs in the match, taking 5 for 64 in the first innings. He also showed his batting potential, something he is keen to develop further, with twin half-centuries against New South Wales in the final game of the season.”Red-ball cricket is the pinnacle of our sport,” he said. “Test cricket is what every kid dreams of growing up. That’s definitely a goal of mine. We’ll have to wait and see but would like to play as much red-ball cricket as I can.”

Sri Lanka ace record chase for first Women's Asia Cup title

No team has ever successfully chased more than Sri Lanka’s 166 in a women’s T20I final

Sampath Bandarupalli28-Jul-20243 – Sri Lanka are only the third team to win the women’s T20 Asia Cup, after India and Bangladesh. India were victorious in 2012, 2016 and 2022, while Bangladesh won in 2018. India also won all four editions of the women’s ODI Asia Cup – 2004, 2005-06, 2006 and 2008.166 – Target that Sri Lanka chased on Sunday, the highest any team has successfully chased in a women’s T20I final. The previous highest was 149 by West Indies against Australia in the 2016 women’s T20 World Cup final.Related

  • Cricket belongs to Chamari's Champions right now

  • Athapaththu and Sri Lanka manifest destiny to become champions

  • Athapaththu, Samarawickrama stun India as Sri Lanka win their first Women's Asia Cup title

1 – The chase of 166 by Sri Lanka is their highest in women’s T20Is, bettering their chase of 156 against South Africa earlier this year. It is also the third-highest successful target chase by any team against India.1 – Sri Lanka also recorded the highest successful target chase in the women’s T20 Asia Cup, bettering the 142-run chase by Bangladesh in 2018 against India in Kuala Lumpur.ESPNcricinfo Ltd304 – Runs scored by Chamari Athapaththu in this Asia Cup – the second-most by any woman in a T20I series or tournament. The highest is 310 runs by Hayley Matthews during a three-match series against Australia last season.47 – Runs conceded by Radha Yadav in this match – the most by a bowler in a women’s T20 Asia Cup game. The previous highest was 45 by Aisya Eleesa against Sri Lanka earlier in this edition. The 47 runs by Radha are also the third-most conceded by an India bowler in a women’s T20I.26 – Fifty-plus scores for Smriti Mandhana in T20I cricket, the second-most by a woman, behind Suzie Bates (29). She surpassed Beth Mooney with her fifty on Sunday.5 – Number of fifty-plus scores for Mandhana in T20I knockout matches, the joint-most by any woman alongside Beth Mooney. Mandhana has three half-centuries in the T20I finals, one behind Mooney’s four.332 – Runs scored by Sri Lanka and India on Sunday in Dambulla. It is the highest aggregate for a women’s T20 Asia Cup game, bettering the 324 runs scored by India and UAE last Sunday.

And so it begins: World Cup opening night from 1800km away

New Zealand vs England as experienced from the back of a taxi in Chennai

Aditya Iyer09-Nov-2024When I start watching the game on my mobile phone in Liyaqath’s taxi shortly after dusk, New Zealand’s reply is underway. Opener Devon Conway is batting at one end. At the other stands the relatively unknown Rachin Ravindra. In his previous seven ODIs, all played in 2023, the curly-mopped left-hander hasn’t batted higher than No. 6. But something about Ravindra’s top score of 61 in a 100-run loss to England at Lord’s in the lead-up to this World Cup made the New Zealand team management promote him to No. 3 in Ahmedabad. It seems to have paid off instantly.With a few quick clicks on chronological time-stamps, Liyaqath and I watch all that we’ve missed in the innings. Just as we go live, Ravindra welcomes us back with a terrific hook off the speedy Mark Wood, where he gets inside the line of the bouncer and almost casually swats it away over square leg for six. There’s a slow-motion clatter of the ball against an electronic hoarding in Motera and a louder crash just in front of us in Guindy, for Liyaqath, in his eagerness to catch the replay, has nudged the car in front of him as we move halfway up the choked flyover. He slams hard on the brake pedal, but the damage has been done.Through the columns of water being displaced on the windscreen, we can see that the right taillight of the Maruti S-Presso ahead of us has been hit. Liyaqath steps out to inspect both cars. Two men emerge from the S-Presso to do the same. One of them is in regular office clothes, a shirt tucked into his trousers, but the other wears a crisp black and a diaphanous black shirt, a very specific kind of combination that only devotees of Sabarimalai Ayappan tend to wear, and immediately I fear that this situation could well take a communal turn; Liyaqath, with his beard under a moustache-free upper lip, is very evidently Muslim.But they just blink at each other in the falling rain, pointing at what I suppose are dents and nicks on both vehicles. I can’t hear what they are saying, but their gestures are pretty self-explanatory: nods and sighs and pursed lips and hands on hips. The man in black walks back to his car and re-emerges with his phone. He shelters the device with a palm and punches in whatever Liyaqath is dictating to him. Missed calls are made, photos of number plates clicked, heads shaken and nodded. That’s it, fracas over. Liyaqath is drenched by the time he heaves himself into the driver’s seat and sighs heavily over the sounds of pelting rain. The S-Presso is now part of the indistinguishable swarm ahead.

I catch the strains of Tamil commentary. I follow the sound and identify three flower-sellers as the ones listening to it, squatting in a line on the sand as they arrange strings of jasmine in coir baskets

Liyaqath is grumpy, muttering and castigating himself for his carelessness. “Please, I want to stop at a tea after this flyover, I just need to compose myself. Only if you don’t mind, please, okay?” he says. In a short while, we are parked beside a
shop from whose awning hang many hands of bananas so ripe that they have lost all nutritional value. It is a stationery store, tobacco shop, confectionery stall, tea halt and shopkeeper’s living room all rolled into one. A woman sits on a red plastic stool, watching the World Cup game on a small TV on the green wall.We duck under the suspended bananas and Liyaqath lifts two fingers at the shopkeeper, who in turn whistles at a working the kettle by the backroom stove, who nods and exaggerates the motion of his pour into two paper cups, mainly to incite fresh froth in the milk chai. We slurp into the rising steam, watching the rain. “It was completely my fault,” says Liyaqath, looking bitterly into his hot beverage. I tell him that I’m just glad the hullabaloo didn’t acquire a communal shade. Liyaqath gives me a quizzical look. Then he throws his head back and laughs, deep, jolly rumbles emanating from his stomach. We now have the shopkeeper’s attention.”This is not your Delhi or Bombay, sir. This is Tamil Nadu, and our politicians might constantly stir other stupid things but they don’t do this Hindu-Muslim-Christian division here,” Liyaqath says. The shopkeeper nods along. “All of us coexist happily, what do you say ?” makes a perfect circle with his head a few times in agreement. Liyaqath likes the validation, the response, the power of telling off an outsider in front of his own, teaching a complete stranger the ways of this land, his land. “Unlike in the north, where widespread illiteracy allows the leaders to take advantage and polarise the people, the south is largely literate. Tougher to turn us against each other. Religion in the south of India, be it here or Kerala, or even Andhra Pradesh, is there to give us believers strength. It doesn’t make us weaker. We can be from any religion but here we are Tamil first, correct ?”The rain has stopped just as suddenly as it had started, and the winding roads leading up to the bay are bathed in the phosphorescent yellow hue of the dim streetlights. About a hundred metres short of Elliot’s Beach, the Uber stops next to a permanent -painted entryway to an apartment block in Besant Nagar, so named after British
educationist Annie Besant, who established the Theosophical Society a stone’s throw from where I stand. I learn that my friend, whose apartment I will be staying in until the end of India’s match in Chennai, is a good two hours away from getting home. I drag my strolley over the wet pavement towards the beach for a lonely wait. But then Liyaqath, parked at the intersection of the residential avenue and the beach road, calls out to me once again.He has pushed his seat back as far as possible and is smoking a herb. Potent, aromatic coils waft from the window as he enquires where I’m headed. On finding out that I’m at a loose end, he says: “Come come, sit inside. Want to try? It is very good, from Idukki.”Penguin Random House”Sure. But can we go to the beach? I happen to have a bottle of whisky that I got for my friend. Would you like to try some of that?”Each of us having accepted the invitation to indulge in the other man’s poison, we sit on the low peripheral wall around the Kaj Schmidt Memorial, a monument consisting of a single archway to remember a Dutch man who died while saving a British girl from drowning in undivided India. That was when this city was very much still Madras. The tide is low and calm, and it laps gently against the receding shore. Watching it, we smoke and drink, drink and smoke.In the silence, we hear two young lovers close by, their faces hidden under a thick jacket, giggle and playfully admonish each other for getting too frisky. I also catch the strains of
Tamil commentary from the Ahmedabad match. I follow the sound and identify three flower-sellers as the ones listening to it, squatting in a line on the sand as they arrange strings of jasmine in coir baskets.Just as the might of the intoxication kicks in, Liyaqath nudges me in the ribs with his elbow and holds out his phone, showing me a picture of a girl no older than five, maybe six. “My daughter. Mahira.”I nod my spinning head.”I named her after Thala.”It doesn’t strike me immediately, so he smiles and pokes me again.”What, sir? Didn’t get the connection? Dhoni, sir! Mahi, sir! That is how I chose the name.”We are now lying on the sand, hands behind heads, looking up at the inky sky in our dizzy silence. Two boys in college uniforms trudge past us with their noses stuck into a mobile
screen. I yell out to them for the score. “Over, over, all over,” one of them shouts back. “Ravindra hundred. Conway 150. Both not out.”Somewhere in the far west of this vast, vast country, the World Cup has well and truly begun. A nation will live and breathe nothing else over the next six weeks, one deep lungful at a time.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus